A studio colour analysis is a genuinely good service and a genuinely expensive one. TIME reported that a three-hour session at House of Colour in Brooklyn runs about 545 US dollars, while studios in Seoul, where the trend exploded, sit closer to 80 to 160 dollars (TIME, 2023). What you are paying for is a trained eye, controlled lighting, and fabric drapes held against your face.
You cannot fully replicate the drapes at home. What you can do is get the reasoning: your undertone, the colours that fight it, a palette with hex codes, and the logic behind all of it, from one photo and a chat.
This step decides everything. Five minutes here beats any prompt tweaking later.
Attach your photo, paste this, send. This is the prompt from the reel.
I have attached a natural-light photo of myself with no filter. Act as an experienced personal colour analyst and read my colouring from it.
Work through it out loud in this order before you conclude anything. First describe what you can actually see: the apparent depth of my skin (light, medium, deep), the apparent depth and tone of my hair, and my eye colour including any secondary tones in the iris. Second, assess my undertone as warm, cool, neutral-warm, neutral-cool or true neutral, and tell me which specific visual cues led you there, for example how my skin sits against the whites of my eyes or against anything white in the frame. Third, assess my contrast level, meaning the difference between my hair, skin and eyes, as low, medium or high, since that matters as much as undertone and almost nobody mentions it. Fourth, give me your best single seasonal category using the twelve-season system, and name your second-best alternative.
Be honest about confidence: tell me how sure you are out of 10, name anything in the photo that made this harder such as lighting cast or shadows, and tell me what a better photo would need. Do not flatter me and do not soften a conclusion to be nice.
Send this next in the same chat so it keeps everything it just worked out.
Based on that reading, give me two lists with real hex codes so I can match shades exactly rather than guessing from a colour name.
The first list is 15 colours that flatter me, grouped into three sections: my neutrals (the colours I should build a wardrobe base from), my power colours (what I wear near my face when it matters), and my accents (small doses, bags, scarves, lips). For every single colour give me the common name, the hex code, and one short line saying why it works with my undertone and contrast.
The second list is 8 colours that work against me. For each one, name it, give the hex code, and say precisely what it does to my face, for example dulls my skin, brings out redness, or flattens my features by matching my contrast level too closely. Then add one line I will actually remember: if I already own a lot of one of those colours, tell me how to keep wearing it, whether that is away from my face, as a lower half, or with a flattering colour layered at the neckline.
A list of hex codes in a chat is easy to lose. Claude can build you a small page showing the actual colours, which you screenshot and keep in your camera roll for shopping. This works because Claude can produce artifacts, small live pages inside the chat (what artifacts are).
Now narrow everything down to a ten-shade capsule palette: the smallest set of colours that would let me get dressed every day and have everything work together.
Choose them with a working wardrobe in mind, so roughly four neutrals I can build outfits on, three mid-tones that pair with everything, two power colours for near my face, and one accent. For each shade give the name, the hex code, what garment it should be (for example "the coat", "the everyday knit", "the going-out top"), and what it pairs with from the other nine.
Then build me a single-page artifact that displays these ten shades as large labelled swatches on a plain background, with the name and the hex code under each one, and the garment role in smaller text below that. Make it look calm and readable on a phone screen, because I am going to screenshot it and open it while I am shopping.
Hex codes are useless in a search bar. Shops name colours their own way, and this prompt translates your palette into the words retailers actually use.
Turn my ten-shade palette into a shopping list I can use in a search bar, because retailers never label anything by hex code.
For each of the ten shades, give me three to five real colour names that shops commonly use for that exact family, for example the difference between "camel", "tan", "biscuit" and "toffee", and flag which of those names tend to run warmer or cooler so I know which listing to trust. Then tell me the three shades I should buy first if I only have budget for three items, and say why those three, given what I already need to wear.
Finish with a short checklist of what to watch for when buying online: what to do about photos taken under studio lighting, which fabrics shift a colour's warmth (for example how the same shade reads on linen versus satin), and how to sanity check a listing colour against my palette before I add it to a cart.
Every prompt above hands you an answer. This one hands you the skill, which is what the studios are really selling. Once you can explain why a colour works on you, you never need a palette card in front of a rack again.
Now teach me the reasoning behind everything you just told me, so I can judge any colour myself without asking you again.
Explain the three variables that actually decide whether a colour suits someone: undertone, value (how light or dark the colour is), and chroma or saturation (how muted or clear it is). For each variable, explain what mine is, what happens visually when a garment matches it, and what happens when it clashes, in plain language rather than industry jargon. Then give me a three-question test I can run in my head in a shop, in order, that gets me to a yes or no on any garment in under ten seconds.
Then quiz me. Name six specific colours one at a time, wait for my answer each time, and tell me whether I got it right and what I missed in my reasoning. Include at least two that are close calls rather than obvious, because those are the ones I keep getting wrong.
TIME on the personal colour analysis boom, including session prices
Uploading files and photos to Claude (Claude Help Center)
How Claude reads images (Anthropic docs)
Anthropic usage policy, for what Claude will and will not do with photos of people